RE: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded

["Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Hi Paul,

  I'm asking all TCs to switch to the new template prior to Public Review. Updating the cover page is only a matter of
replacing a few existing out-of-date metdata fields with one or two new ones; you folks already have the URIs you need
for the cover page since they're already in use, and the namespace is declared.

  Yes, the RDDL is a necessary component of the PR; otherwise the documents will be hidden from view.

Regards,

Mary 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 3:49 AM
> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> Cc: gilbert.pilz@bea.com; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
> 
> Mary
> 
> Our editors have had a look at the new template and they are 
> concerned that switching to the new template will affect the 
> PR timing and our vote.
> 
> They have suggested the following approach:
> * The main difference between the new template and the old is 
> the IPR text.
> * Therefore we add the IPR text to the current document for PR
> * During PR the editors switch to the new template and work 
> on the HTML output
> * In addition they fix up the RDDL document during that period
> 
> I think this addresses the problems for PR. Firstly, as long 
> as the PR doc has the right IPR text the formatting shouldn't 
> be an issue.
> Secondly, as I understand it the RDDL isn't a necessary piece 
> of the PR.
> 
> I have asked the editors to produce you the docs with the 
> updated IPR text.
> 
> Please let me know if this is acceptable.
> 
> Paul
> 
> Mary McRae wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > 
> >   I'm afraid that there's some work to be done on the 
> package before 
> > it can be sent out for public review. Since the documents 
> will need to 
> > be changed, I'm going to ask you to switch to the new 
> templates as well, which satisfy the Naming Guidelines and 
> Metadata policy that was adopted last fall.
> > 
> > The template home page is here: 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/
> > and you should be using the template for the 4-15-2005 IPR notices:
> > 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.do
> > t (Word) or 
> > 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.ot
> > t (OO)
> > 
> > The user guide 
> > 
> (http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASIS_Specification_Temp
> late_Guidelines.html) hopefully does a good job of explaining 
> what information goes where as well as links to the specific 
> sections of the policy documents.
> > 
> > Robin and I are also discussing how to handle the new/old 
> namespace - 
> > including noting the previous namespace in the current RDDL and 
> > potentially making some note in the older one (200608). As 
> I'm just reviewing this on Sat AM, I don't anticipate being 
> able to resolve those questions until early next week but 
> will get back to the TC as soon as possible.
> > 
> > ----
> > 
> > WS-Reliable Messaging (wsrm)
> > Specification:
> > In general:
> > Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the 
> > templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice 
> section from the rear of the document to the front.
> > 
> > 1. The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is 
> > acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. 
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 2. The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it 
> is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 3. Acknowledgements:
> > Christopher Ferris-Editor(BM) -- (should be IBM?)
> > 
> > DIFF (PDF file)
> > There are two diff files in the zip; I need a single diff file that 
> > compares the version previously submitted for PR
> > (200608) with the current document.
> > 
> > RDDL
> > *NOTE There should be some mention of the previous 
> namespace; there is 
> > also discussion underway about what information should be 
> placed at the previous (200608) namespace indicating that 
> it's been superceded.
> > 
> > Schema
> > The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it 
> is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > WSDL
> > The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is 
> acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > 
> > 
> > WS-MakeConnection (wsmc)
> > Specification:
> > In general:
> > Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the 
> > templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice 
> section from the rear of the document to the front.
> > 
> > Specifics:
> > 1. This is the first CD of this document and should be marked 
> > accordingly (Committee Draft 01) 2. Revision history must note that 
> > this document began with extracted section(s) from WSRM and 
> identify those section(s). Alternatively, this is a new 
> document and subject to a 60-day public review.
> > 3. The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is 
> > acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. 
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > RDDL
> > 1. This is the first CD of this document and should be marked 
> > accordingly (revision 01)
> > 
> > Schema
> > The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it 
> is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > WSDL
> > The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is 
> acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > DIFF
> > For some reason there's a diff file in this directory; this 
> is the first instance of this document.
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > 
> > 
> > WS-RM Policy (wsrmp)
> > Specification:
> > In general:
> > Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the 
> > templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice 
> section from the rear of the document to the front.
> > 
> > 1.The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is 
> > acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. 
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > DIFF (PDF file)
> > There are two diff files in the zip; I need a single diff file that 
> > compares the version previously submitted for PR
> > (200608) with the current document.
> > 
> > RDDL
> > *NOTE There should be some mention of the previous 
> namespace; there is 
> > also discussion underway about what information should be 
> placed at the previous (200608) namespace indicating that 
> it's been superceded.
> > 
> > Schema
> > The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it 
> is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > ----
> > 
> > I'll try to turn new files around as quickly as possible 
> but can make no promises beyond the stated 5 business day SLA.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Mary
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:43 PM
> >> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> >> Cc: gilbert.pilz@bea.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org; 
> >> marypmcrae@gmail.com
> >> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
> >>
> >> Mary
> >>
> >> The basic situation is that 22286 has more beautiful HTML and
> >> 22268 has the images in it.
> >>
> >> I propose that we go with 22268 for PR (since it is more 
> accurate if 
> >> less beautiful) and that in the meantime the editors will 
> prepare a 
> >> beautified version of the HTML that will be the basis of our CS.
> >>
> >> Please remember to include our HTML disclaimer!
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Mary McRae wrote:
> >>> So I should use this one (22286) rather than 22268?
> >>>
> >>> m
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: gilbert.pilz@bea.com [mailto:gilbert.pilz@bea.com]
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:16 PM
> >>>> To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> >>>> Cc: marypmcrae@gmail.com
> >>>> Subject: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
> >>>>
> >>>> Replaced HTML versions with Marc Goodner's better HTML files.
> >>>>
> >>>>  -- Gilbert Pilz
> >>>>
> >>>> The document revision named ws-rx_cd05.zip has been submitted by 
> >>>> Gilbert Pilz to the OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange
> >>>> (WS-RX) TC document repository.  This document is revision #1 of 
> >>>> ws-rx_cd05.zip.
> >>>>
> >>>> Document Description:
> >>>> Complete WS-RX CD05 package in proper directory 
> structure and RDDL 
> >>>> files.
> >>>> Replaced HTML versions with Marc Goodner's better HTML files.
> >>>>
> >>>> View Document Details:
> >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/document.ph
> >>>> p?document_id=22286
> >>>>
> >>>> Download Document:  
> >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.ph
> >>>> p/22286/ws-rx_cd05.zip
> >>>>
> >>>> Revision:
> >>>> This document is revision #1 of ws-rx_cd05.zip.  The
> >> document details
> >>>> page referenced above will show the complete revision history.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email 
> >>>> application may be breaking the link into two pieces.
> >>>> You may be able to copy and paste the entire link 
> address into the 
> >>>> address field of your web browser.
> >>>>
> >>>> -OASIS Open Administration
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Paul Fremantle
> >> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> >>
> >> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> >> paul@wso2.com
> >> (646) 290 8050
> >>
> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> 
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
> (646) 290 8050
> 
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>