RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD9

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Dunno. The template shows a "day"
portion of the date so I assumed they wanted it.  But if Mary says
otherwise I'm ok with just saying "April" and avoid the joke
 :-)

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com

"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>

03/21/2007 11:22 AM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD9

Do we really need exact date on
the specs? Wouldn't specifying month and year be sufficient?
-- Sanjay

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Mar 21, 2007 4:37 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] CD9


All, 
  in prep for any changes from the policy discussions I created a
CD9 folder and uploaded all of the latest files into it.  Someone
noticed that the xsd in the doc file had a typo - it was missing a  's="unbounded"'
 on a "maxOccur" line.  The actual xsd file itself
was fine.  So, I increased the version # on just the WSRMP doc file
and fixed this one line. 

  Not wanting to exceed my limitations as a monkey I didn't update
the date on the files but I suspect they should all be set to April 1st
( coincidence? :-) .  Any comments on this one?

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com