RE: [ws-rx-editors] v1.2cd01 ready?

["Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>]

Hi Doug,

Thanks for producing the CD drafts. Please see my inline comments below.

-- Sanjay
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, Feb 19, 2008 12:21 PM
> To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-rx-editors] v1.2cd01 ready?
> 
> 
> Editors, 
>   could I get someone to look at the v1.2CD01 version of the 
> specs to make sure all of the edits we agreed to during the 
> last RX conf call were done correctly?   
> 
> Things to look for: 
> - both sets of footers are correct (spec name and date) 
> - "both" meaning there are two types of footers in the doc
I can't find the two kinds of footers. I am sure I am missing something.
You have changed the OASIS Copyright from 1993-2007 to 1993-2008. Is
this kind of change within our purview or should we check with OASIS
first?
Also - Has anything in the schema and WSDL file changed? I noticed that
the OASIS Copyright in these file still says: 1993 - 2007

> - title page has the correct version number, name, date and hrefs 
If we vote for CD approval on the 2/28 call, I think the date on CD can
be 2/28/08 (and not 3/6/08). I guess we could cover this item under 'Pro
forma' changes.

> - removal of policy 1.2 refs in the normative refs section 
Looks good to me.

> - upate of sx (SecPolicy and Trust) refs in the normative 
> refs section 
Do we need to say "Feb 2008" in the reference? Can we not reference only
the spec name and the version number for the purposes of our CDs?

> - update of RM refs in the normative refs section 
I think RM refs should be to the new CDs (and not to the OS versions).

> 
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
>