RE: [ws-rx-implement] Propose a call

["Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>]

I don't think number of issues is a good criteria since the remaining
amount of work really depends upon the actual complexity of the issues.
I would be fine with including the Implementation SC discussions as the
last agenda item on the main TC calls so that the SC members can utilize
remaining time, if any, and those main TC members who are not interested
in the SC could hang up. But I am not sure that will help plan the SC
activities in a predictable manner!

Thanks,
Sanjay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Monday, Jan 23, 2006 14:24 PM
> To: Patil, Sanjay; Paul Fremantle; Matthew Lovett
> Cc: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-implement] Propose a call
> 
> What are your criteria for that? We have less than 10 open issues
> already. Is under control no open issues?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] 
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:22 AM
> To: Marc Goodner; Paul Fremantle; Matthew Lovett
> Cc: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-implement] Propose a call
> 
> 
> We could consider that once the main TC gets the issues list under
> control and I don't think we are there yet. I think Paul F also made
> this point earlier.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sanjay
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, Jan 23, 2006 13:57 PM
> > To: Paul Fremantle; Matthew Lovett
> > Cc: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-implement] Propose a call
> > 
> > Is there anyway we could simply reduce the TC call to one 
> hour and use
> > the last 30 minutes to discuss this topic? 
> > 
> > Marc Goodner
> > Technical Diplomat
> > Microsoft Corporation
> > Tel: (425) 703-1903
> > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/ 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 2:52 AM
> > To: Matthew Lovett
> > Cc: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] Propose a call
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > I wasn't intending these to be the regular times. I'm just 
> trying to 
> > bootstrap the process. Can you let me know which times you 
> > can do this 
> > week? We can organise a further call time on the call itself.
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > Matthew Lovett wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > Thanks for suggesting the call, I agree that it would be 
> > useful. As a 
> > > UK resident, if these times are going to become a recurring 
> > event I'd 
> > > much prefer the Tuesday options! Given the main TC call is 
> > taking up 
> > > the Thursday night, I (and others I'm sure) would rather 
> > leave early 
> > > on Fridays. Either timeslot on the Tuesday is fine.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>*
> > >
> > > 21/01/2006 08:38
> > >
> > > 	
> > > To
> > > 	ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > cc
> > > 	
> > > Subject
> > > 	[ws-rx-implement] Propose a call
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 	
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Implementors
> > >
> > > Can I suggest we have a call to kick off the discussion of 
> > the interop
> > > scenarios that Marc and Dug have worked on?
> > >
> > > At that call we can identify if we need to have regular calls. I
> > expect
> > > we will need to.
> > >
> > > If we can get the main issues list under control we may be able to
> > move
> > > to alternate calls at the regular time - one week main 
> TC, one week
> > > Impl, but for the moment we need to schedule some alternate calls.
> > >
> > > Here are a few times I can make:
> > >
> > > 10am Pacific/6pmGMT Tuesday
> > > 11am Pacific/7pmGMT Tuesday
> > > 8am Pacific/4pmGMT Friday
> > > 9am Pacific/5pmGMT Friday
> > >
> > > A rough agenda:
> > > 1. Aims of ImplSC
> > > 2. Call schedule and frequency
> > > 3. Interop scenarios
> > > 4. Issue management
> > > 5. Schedule
> > > 6. Spec basis of interop
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > -- 
> > >
> > > Paul Fremantle
> > > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > >
> > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> > > paul@wso2.com
> > >
> > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > Paul Fremantle
> > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > 
> > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> > paul@wso2.com
> > 
> > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > 
> > 
>