[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc
Doug I agree this is unresolved, but it seems unlikely we are going to fix this in two weeks in time to get the interop scenarios done. I am imagining we will do another interop after we publish our PR draft. Paul Doug Davis wrote: > > We need to figure out how RM is going to compose with Security - while > the current spec > says nothing I don't believe this is acceptable for the final version. > Or, if it is then I'd like > to have that conversation before the interop so we know its the final > outcome. > -Doug > > > > *"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>* > > 01/28/2006 01:20 PM > > > To > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> > cc > "Paul Fremantle" <paul@wso2.com>, <ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org> > Subject > RE: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc > > > > > > > > > > Doug, > > Are you referring to a particular issue by "resolution of the STR". I > am a bit unclear about this. > > -- Sanjay > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] * > Sent:* Saturday, Jan 28, 2006 5:02 AM* > To:* Marc Goodner* > Cc:* Paul Fremantle; ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org* > Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc > > > I'd be ok with including these issues in the interop as long as they > appeared, at least, in a WD. Although, I'd add the resolution of the > STR to the list too. > -Doug > > > *"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>* > > 01/27/2006 05:30 PM > > > To > "Paul Fremantle" <paul@wso2.com> > cc > <ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org> > Subject > RE: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems we should also evaluate other issues that are pending for a WD > like this as well as other issues that are not closed but we may be > close on. A quick look at the issue list and I would pick the following > as potentially having the most impact to the interop scenarios: > - i021 > - i078 > - i090 > > Any reason we wouldn't want to go to another CD immediately from a new > WD that at a minimum had i085 applied? That would give a pretty stable > reference point for the interop activities. > > Marc Goodner > Technical Diplomat > Microsoft Corporation > Tel: (425) 703-1903 > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 1:03 PM > To: Marc Goodner > Cc: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc > > Marc > > I think i085 is the key issue to include in the interop. If we could get > > a WD = CD2+i085 then I think that would be a great basis. I was going to > > suggest this on the call. I also know that Dug suggested this on a > previous chat. > > I'd be interested to know if there is anyone who would object to that > model. > > Paul > > Marc Goodner wrote: > > > > I read tea leaves and incorporated the change to Close from i085 in > > the current interop doc. There is no spec that reflects that change > > today, certainly not CD02 that the interop doc points to. So the > > question is what version of the spec should this point to? Should it > > be a CD, like 02, + issues resolved up to N date? If the later then > > should we get a WD at that date, with a new namespace (making an > > exception to the rule in i088) that we could be given to a developer > > to reference? Or should we get to that date and do another extra CD > > from what we have already planned? > > > > > > > > Do we need all the issues closed before we can go forward with this? > > Sanjay indicated he thought we needed more progress on the issues, but > > > with under ten already it seems to me that means all them are closed. > > > > > > > > Marc Goodner > > > > Technical Diplomat > > > > Microsoft Corporation > > > > Tel: (425) 703-1903 > > > > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/ > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Fremantle > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > paul@wso2.com > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle paul@wso2.com "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]