Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

+1 to preserving the names as they are.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> wrote on 07/14/2005 12:15:29 AM:

> Title: Document Names 
> Description: Should the ?names? of the normative documents remain the 
same as the submission 
> documents or should they be changed? This issue applies to both 
WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-RM Policy.
> Justification: The ?name? of a document effects a number of things such 
as the document 
> identifier, URIs etc.
> Target: core, policy
> Type: editorial
> Proposal: Preserve the name of the documents as submitted. Changing the 
names would increase 
> confusion (already at a high level) around ?OASIS and RM? and result in 
extra effort. There does 
> not seem to be any reasons for changing the names forcefull enough to 
override these concerns. 
> Therefore the names of the normative documents should be ?Web Services 
Reliable Messaging Protocol
> (WS-ReliableMessaging)? and ?Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy 
Assertion (WS-RM Policy)?