[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
I think you meant AtMostOnce mode. I suppose you could do that, but from the perspective of the RMS, it is still retransmitting until it receives an ack. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 Dan Leshchiner <dleshc@tibco.com> wrote on 07/27/2005 06:36:24 PM: > Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > >However, the protocol as specified would never be able to complete a > >sequence > >if there are lost messages from the RMD perspective and the RMS is not > >retransmitting them. > > > > > why so? as RMD, if i see a gap or AckRequested for a sequence number i > have not received and i am operating in "at least once" mode with my AD, > why cant i just send an Ack? if i did so, wouldn't that enable us to > complete the sequence? > > thanks, > dan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]