OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014

I agree with Oracle. The name WS-RX becomes associated with the open
process spec, as an output. This differentiates it from the proprietary
process input spec, and also is symbolic of the fusion of input from the
WS-Reliability group. 

A + B = C <> A, even if A > B. 

Plus, the TC/spec name clash is, as Ashok, points out, confusing to the
outer world. My contacts in the end-user world are already confused.


-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
Sent: 28 July 2005 18:48
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014

I disagree. Adding yet another document name does nothing to stop any
confusion regarding names, it only increases it. The document names as
contributed are already well established, changing them only introduces
a new challenge for this TC that we don't need of promoting the new
name. Keeping the document names the same as the contributions keeps the
status quo that has been in this area for some. Asking people to learn a
new name for these specs to reduce confusion is counter intuitive.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 8:51 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014

The Oracle folks would like to express our preference on issue i014.

We would like the documents to be named WS-RX (Web Services Reliable
This aligns the names of the documents with the name of the WG.  It also
removes possible confusion with other documents in the same space.

All the best, Ashok

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]