OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?

Doug is making a very good point here.  We should decide for each reference if we want to point to the “Latest Version” URI or to a specific dated version URI.




Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: September 21, 2005 9:21 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?


Do we really need to point to a specific version of WS-Addr?  I thought that one
of the composibility aspects of these WS specs was that we wouldn't need to change
all of them just because one of them was modified.  As long as the basic ideas of
WSA (that RM needs) don't change - like EPRs, MI Headers... can't we just talk about
them in generic terms and let the implementations decide which version they want to
support?  Should one that (for some reason) can't step up to the latest WSA be tagged
as non-RM compliant?  I don't think it should.  It may not be as interoperable, but that's
a different story.
I've seen other specs go thru quite a lot of pain because different specs they're
composing with point to different levels of WSA - and they actually try to support
more than one at the same time - what a hassle.

Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>

09/20/2005 04:01 PM


wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>




[ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?




Title: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?

Page 25, lines 664-665 at [1] says:
"WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property the
default fault action URI defined in the version of WS-Addressing used in
the message."

This can be interpreted as any version of WS-Addressing is allowed with
WSRM. WSRM spec should specify which version of WS-Addressing is used by
the spec.

A related issue is that:
On page 25, lines 664-666 talk about the default
"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/fault" as the Fault
[action] property. This default is defined only for the SOAP binding and
is meant to be used with WS-Addr faults not WSRM faults.

Without clearly indicating which version of WS-Addressing is
required/used by the spec, independent implementation will not
interoperate. WS-Addressing specification has changed substantially (in
certain sections/artifacts of the WS-Addressing spec) over the years.

Target: core

Type: design

Use the CR version of the spec [2] (in this paragraph as well as the
normative reference for the spec) for now and make changes as the
addressing spec transitions through the process of becoming a REC. Based
on the WS-Addr schedule and WSRM schedule, WS-Addr is slated to become a
REC before WSRM is final.

For the related issue:
change line 664 from --
"WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property the
default fault"
to --
"WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property as
defined by WS-Addressing [ref]."
delete lines 665-667

Related issues: none

[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-ws-addr-core-20050817/

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]