[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Proposal to resolve Issue 006
Description Is there a requirement that the sender can assert that the receiver must deliver a particular reliability assurance on a given sequence? Discussion It has been agreed that the protocol is the same on any ws -rm Sequence, regardless of DA level agreements in place between RMD and Destination Application. There is no need to have a standard protocol mechanism for the RMS to signal DA requirments on the sequence for the RMD. If reliaiblity policy is attached to a destination endpoint at a finer level of granularity than endpoint subject level, an implementaton (extension beyond normal conformance) would have to use means outside the scope of this standard to convey such requirements (e.g., RMD could be aware of the wsdl description). Proposed resolution to Issue 006: close issue with no changes to specfication. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]