RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 10/13 conf-call

["Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

I don't think i006 needs to be linked to the others. As Tom already
proposed on this issue no matter the outcome of i008 and i021 this would
be outside the scope of WS-RM. Why don't we go ahead and try to close at
least that one?

-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 11:56 AM
To: tom@coastin.com
Cc: Christopher B Ferris; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 10/13
conf-call

Tom Rutt wrote:
> Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> 
>>
>> Sanjay,
>>
>> I can appreciate that POV, but frankly, I think that the protocol
spec 
>> is far more important.
>> There aren't many outstanding issues and it would be great if we
could 
>> close on the issues
>> we have and nail down the protocol spec sooner rather than later.
>>
> Issue 006 could have impact on the protocol spec, and it depends on 
> issues 008 and 021.
> 
> However, I agree that the email around these proposed solutions has
not 
> yet reached concensus.
> 
> Thus I do not mind postponing resolution of 6, 8, and 21 until further

> discussion occurs on the list.
> 

Postponing these issues until there is further discussion make sense to 
me too.

-Anish
--

<snip/>