[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] i006 -- a proposal
Anish Karmarkar wrote: > I would like to convert my suggestion in my previous email (can't > provide a reference as I can't find the email in our archive) to a > proposal to resolve i006: > > Use the wsrmp:DeliveryAssurance element (as defined in the resolution > of i009) in the CS message as follows: > > <wsrm:CreateSequence ...> > <wsrm:AcksTo ...> wsa:EndpointReferenceType </wsrm:AcksTo> > <wsrm:Expires ...> xs:duration </wsrm:Expires> ? > <wsrm:Offer ...> > <wsrm:Identifier ...> xs:anyURI </wsrm:Identifier> > <wsrm:Expires ...> xs:duration </wsrm:Expires> ? > ... > </wsrm:Offer> ? > * <wsrmp:DeliveryAssurrance .../>?* > ... > </wsrm:CreateSequence> > > This would allow the Application Sender to signal the RMD/AD of the > DA. If the DA is something that is not supported or conflict the > policy at the RMD/AD, the RMD may send a CreateSequenceRefused fault. > This element of course does not change the protocol on the wire, but > lets the RMD/AD know exactly the DA that is expected for the Sequence. Perhaps the fault could include detail info on which DAs are supported by the RMD/AD. Tom > > -Anish > -- > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]