Action Item #0053

["Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>]

Attached is the proposed RDDL document for http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510 and http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200510 (thanks to Steve Winkler for getting the ball rolling on this). There are a number of issues that need to be worked through the TC.

 

1.) The editors want to add links to resources describing schema and WSDL. We think it makes sense to pull the schema and WSDL out of the main specs and put them in separate files. These files could be pulled into the main specs before publishing as WDs or CDs. This prevents us from having to synchronize changes between the main specs and the actual schema and WSDL files.

 

2.) Can we/should we use a single RDDL document to describe two distinct namespaces? Will software agents be able to disambiguate between the links for the WS-RM schema and the WS-RM Policy schema? Do we need to maintain two separate copies of the same RDDL document or can we use some re-direction tricks to use just one copy?

 

- g

 

Title: Web Services Reliable Messaging (WS-ReliableMessaging)

Web Services Reliable Messaging (WS-ReliableMessaging)

December 2005

Introduction

This document describes versions 1.1 of the WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-RM Policy namespaces. It also contains a directory of links to related resources using Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL) 2.0.

Normative References

1. WS-ReliableMessaging Core Specification
2. WS-ReliableMessaging Policy Specification

Schema

TBD

WSDL

TBD

Examples

TBD