RE: [ws-rx] Comments on latest working drafts

One other thing, the URI reference in WS-RM Policy needs to be updated to match WS-RM. In WD 03 it still points to 2396 instead of 3986.

From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:51 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Comments on latest working drafts

I think all of my comments below are editorial. I hope these can be addressed for the documents that go up for the CD ballot. Many thanks to the editors for getting these done over the holidays.

Both documents

Namespace should be updated (I’ll start a separate thread on this)

Schema and WSDL

Shouldn’t both of these have OASIS boilerplate in comments?
File name seems wrong, why is the date part of the name? I think the form is product-productVersion-artifactType-stage-revision which would give us wsrm-1.1-schema-wd-08.xsd as and example. Personally given the file extension gives the type I think we shouldn’t use it in the file name, it makes more sense for a spec which has multiple extension types used (i.e. .pdf, .html, etc.).
The files aren’t available at the location specified.

WS-RM Policy WD 03

Looks good other than the above.

WS-RM WD 08

Line numbers from the diff bar version

Section 2.4, first paragraph after bullets, line 247: “Should the acknowledgement…” should be “Should an acknowledgement…”

Section 3.1, line 274: “Note, offering…” this sounds like it is trying to make the following text non-normative. Suggest changing to “Note that offering…” to prevent that interpretation.

Section 5, line 814: WS-Trust missing a reference (would be non-normative as WS-SecureConversation is).

Section 6, line 893: URI date is wrong, it should be January 2005

Section 6, line 926: SecureConversation date is wrong, it should be February 2005

Marc Goodner

Technical Diplomat

Microsoft Corporation

Tel: (425) 703-1903

Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/

ws-rx message