Re: [ws-rx] New Issue re Action item 63 - Unexpected UnknownSequenceFaultor SequenceTerminated Fault

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Bob - is there going to be a formal
proposal (exact text changes...) for inclusion of a state table?
thanks,
-Doug

"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>

01/12/2006 03:59 PM

To	"[WS-RX]" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	[ws-rx] New Issue re Action item 63 - Unexpected UnknownSequenceFault or SequenceTerminated Fault

Title - Unexpected UnknownSequenceFault
or SequenceTerminatedFault
Description -
Justification – State table indicates
insufficient specification of these faults condition.
Target - core / design
Type: design
Proposal:
 
Core:
Ref WD08
Insert after line 706:
Receipt of SequenceTerminated by either
the RMD or the RMS shall terminate the sequence if it is not otherwise
terminated.
 
Insert after line 715:
Receipt of UnknownSequence by either
the RMD or the RMS shall terminate the sequence if it is not otherwise
terminated.
 
State Table:
Ref 1.0:RMD
Change next state row 15, columns E-H to
Terminated
Change next state row 16, columns E-H to
Terminated
 
Ref 1.0 RMS
Change next state row 17 columns E-I to Terminated
Change next state row 18 columns D-H to Terminated