i086: Impact on schema

["Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

I'd like to know the answer to the question below as well. What is the
impact to the schema from this proposal?

Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/ 


-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Paul Fremantle
Cc: wsrx
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Alternative approach for MaxMessage

Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Title - Alternative approach for MaxMessage
> Description - We solved the issue of some platforms not having a
native 
> unsigned long by adding a MaxMessageNumber to Policy. Another simpler 
> approach would be to use max(signed long) as the limit, and ensure
that 
> all implementations can support this.

Did you mean 'signed long' or something like:
<xs:simpleType>
   <xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedLong">
     <xs:minInclusive value="1"/>
     <xs:maxInclusive value="9223372036854775807"/>
   </xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>

-Anish
--

> Justification - This is not a critical issue, but this is a simpler 
> approach, with fewer moving parts.
> Target - core / design
> Type: design
> Proposal:
> 
> Policy:
> Remove lines 97-100 plus editorial fixup of following para.
> Remove line 114
> Remove line 130-134
> 
> Core:
> Update line 465 to state new limit.
> Add a schema restriction on line 870
> 
> Paul
> 
>