Only time? I think
the scenario is pretty clear so what are the issues with it you see that would
prevent it from working?
If you are suggesting
that you want to do interop on it first then are you likewise suggesting that
this issue (and I would infer i090) should be deferred from being closed until
then?
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
10:04 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [i089] a
revised proposal
Yea, I figured you'd say that :-) that's why I
wanted the latest text in the issue list. W.r.t. your assertion that anon
replyTo can work w/RM - only time (and your proposal) will tell :-)
-Doug
|
"Marc Goodner"
<mgoodner@microsoft.com>
02/21/2006 12:55 PM
|
|
To
|
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] a revised proposal
|
|
I can’t support this. I think
some of the scenarios we have been discussing around the use of Offer demonstrate
that you can get a reliable response back when using an anon wsa:ReplyTo value.
I think the proposal would be OK if the last sentence, beginning
“Note” was struck.
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:31 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] [i089] a revised proposal
For issue 089, I'd like to offer this revised proposed text (same basic idea
just different wording):
After line 441 of [1] add:
Messages sent using this protocol MUST NOT use a wsa:To value that would
prohibit the RM Source from retransmitting unacknowledged messages. For
example, using WS-Addressing's anonymous IRI, without any additional
transmission mechanism, would restrict an RM Source's ability to
re-establishing a new connection to the RM Destination when a re-transmission
of a message is needed. Note, that this implicitly impacts possibles
values used in other places - for example, in wsa:ReplyTo when responses are
expected to be transmitted reliably.
thanks,
-Doug
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/16095/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-08.pdf