[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
Yes Tom, I guess it wasn't clear. The issue is whether the RMD sends a TSFault or a CSFault, and proposed change is to recommend a CSFault over a TSFault. Paul Tom Rutt wrote: > Paul Fremantle wrote: > >> Title: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate >> >> Description: >> If the RMD terminates the sequence, the RMS cannot know which >> messages are acknowledged. That is why we added CloseSequence. We >> should recommend that RMD's use CloseSequence rather than >> TerminateSequence. >> >> Justification: >> At the moment the spec says the RMD "may" close the sequence. >> However, unless there is a specific reason (e.g. resource issues, >> security issues etc), it is better if the RMD closes rather than >> terminates. > > Do you mean the RMD sends a sequenceClosed fault to the RMS? > >> >> Target: core >> Type: editorial >> >> Proposal: >> >> From WD-10: >> >> At line 381: Replace: >> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a >> sequence it may 'close' the sequence itself." >> with >> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a >> sequence it is RECOMMENDED that it 'close' the sequence." >> >> Related issues: None >> >> Thanks to Stefan Rossmanith for pointing this out. >> >> Paul >> > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf paul@wso2.com "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]