[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
Rich I agree that the requests may use a single persistent HTTP1.1 connection. But I don't believe the scenario should rely on that behaviour. It should work on both multiplexed and multiple HTTP connections. Paul Richard Salz wrote: > Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> wrote on 03/16/2006 02:47:42 PM: > >> It seems that you are considering each http request starts is own tcp >> connection. If this is the >> case in your scenario, my comment on http piggybacking is not relevant. >> > > I don't think that's a valid assumption to make (so your comment is > spot-on). Many network devices will "multiplex" multiple transient > clients over a single HTTP connection between the device and the app > server. > > /r$ > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf paul@wso2.com "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]