[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RX new proposed issues 4/20 - 4/26
Call it proposed-01, this is the only one I've seen. Marc Goodner Technical Diplomat Microsoft Corporation Tel: (425) 703-1903 Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ -----Original Message----- From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:52 PM To: wsrx Subject: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Issue 21 resolution text contains language about 'parameters' which don't exist Per my AI on the call today, here is the new issue. -Anish -- Title: Issue 21 resolution text contains language about 'parameters' which don't exist Description: Issue 21 resolution text contains the following text: "If the RM policy assertion appears in a policy expression attached to a wsdl:binding as well as to the individual wsdl:binding level message definitions(wsdl:binding/wsdl:operation/wsdl:input, wsdl:binding/wsdl:operation/wsdl:output, wsdl:binding/wsdl:operation/wsdl:fault), the parameters in the former MUST be used and the latter ignored. If the RM policy assertion appears in a policy expression attached to a wsdl:port as well as to the other allowed WSDL/1.1 elements, the parameters in the former MUST be used and the latter ignored." The WSRMP spec does not define any 'parameters', therefore these statements don't mean anything and are possibly misleading (may lead reader to believe something about policy merges that may or may not be true). Justification: See above. Target: WSRM policy Proposal: Remove the two offending statements mentioned above.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]