RE: [ws-rx] Proposed issues for discussion 1st June

["Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>]

Paul,

I thought we had agreed to postpone any discussion of i115 until after
we had resolved i122?

I just mention this as a reminder; personally I don't feel that i115 and
i122 are linked. It is true that the proposal for i122 does contain a
reference to wsrm:mustUnderstand, but that is an optimization to prevent
the creation of unwanted Sequences (several off-color jokes come to mind
but I'll spare the TC). The proposal of i122 could easily be ammended to
remove this reference although (obviously) we would not gain the
benefits of the optimization.

- gp

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:18 PM
> To: wsrx
> Subject: [ws-rx] Proposed issues for discussion 1st June
> 
> Folks
> 
> Here is the proposed list of issues for this weeks call:
> 
> i089    Doug Davis     suggest the restricted use of anonymous URI
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> s.xml#i089
> 
> i119    Doug Davis    When to piggy-back RM headers
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> s.xml#i119
> 
> i115    Gilbert Pilz    "must understand" attribute for 
> extensions to RM 
> components
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> s.xml#i115
> 
> i125    Paul Fremantle   Protocol precondition requires knowledge of 
> policies
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> s.xml#i125
> 
> Paul
> 
> -- 
> 
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> 
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
> paul@wso2.com
> 
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> 
>