[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal
Doug, A joint proposal from whom? Which options are now off the table from the submitting group's perspective? Apart from a number of typographic and grammatic errors I'll leave to out esteemed monkeys and / or editors (assuming for a millisecond this gets accepted), a few questions: * Could you please explain (I know, one more time) how you see this alternative SOAP binding to be in scope for the WS-RX TC? I am most concerned about the [ <wsrm:Address> /xs:anyURI/ </wsrm:Address> ] ? portion and its implications. I am having trouble seeing this aspect from your perspective. Why is it our responsibility to solve the one-direction-works-better transfer protocol issue for every WS-RM exchange, let alone everyone? * The text remains unclear about piggy-backing response messages on the underlying protocol back channel. If you and I are using HTTP to communicate, may I place response messages in the HTTP response to messages from the same sequence? Can you switch to (and from) using MakeConnection at any point, say when you haven't sent an outbound message in the sequence for some interval? * "this URI is semantically equivalent to the WS-Addressing anonymous URI if a protocol-specific back-channel is available" seem to answer some of the above bullet in the negative, disallowing one of the more interesting use cases. That is, (as a corner case perhaps worth solving in this TC), I am interested in getting additional information back to you after you are done sending me messages. I don't however know in advance when you'll be done. I'd certainly rather we didn't have to waste time with extra MakeConnection round trips while you are still sending me regular messages in the sequence (over HTTP). It seems if a back channel is available we must always use it. * If we get this far: Why send the whole URI in the wsrm:Address element? Why not just provide the supposedly-sufficient UUID? * Minor: [ <wsrm:Identifier> /xs:anyURI/ </wsrm:Identifier> ] ? [ <wsrm:Address> /xs:anyURI/ </wsrm:Address> ] ? should probably be ([ <wsrm:Identifier> /xs:anyURI/ </wsrm:Identifier> ] [ <wsrm:Address> /xs:anyURI/ </wsrm:Address> ] ?) | [ <wsrm:Address> /xs:anyURI/ </wsrm:Address> ] or some such. thanx, doug On 31/05/06 19:12, Doug Davis wrote: > All, > the planets have aligned and we managed to come up with a joint > proposal for the TC to discuss on tomorrow's call. Enjoy!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]