RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>
wrote on 06/08/2006 03:21:54 PM:
> > 3- Now with an in-out exchange with (rel in / non-rel out), the
out 
> > message is not mediated by any RMD-client. How would this out
> > message be delivered to its endpoint, in case the "in"
message was 
> > resent by RMS-client? It probably should contain explicit endpoint
> > info (wsa:To?) but then how does the server know when to add
this, 
> > while it would not have to if the in message originated from
the 
> > sending endpoint vs. the RMS-client? 
> > Are we saying that the anon URI template should be understood
> > outside RM components? (doesn't that fall under wsa scope, and
> > beyond wsrm scope?) 
> 
> Not sure I followed this but let me try... 
> In the rel-in/non-rel-out case, if the RMS-client resends the 
> rel-in message then I would suspect that all but one of those 
> attempts would get back a 202 since all but one are dups. 
> In the one non-202 case if the replyTo was anon then it would 
> carry the response.  
>  
> But doesn't this assume that the "duplicate
elimination" delivery 
> assurance is in effect between the RMD and the AD? Can we really 
> assume this? Can we assume that the RMS is aware of this?

You're correct we can not assume that.  However,
when dup 
detection is in effect I think all but one would get
a 202.
In the non-dup-detection case, more than one might
return
a real response since more than one message made it
to the AD.
I don't think this is anything special and is true
even without
this polling shtuff.

thanks
-Doug