OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal


Gil

I don't think we can make any assumptions about the place where dup 
elimination takes place. I think either you might get a 202 or a 
response message.

Paul

Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> One comment inline
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
>     *Sent:* Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:14 AM
>     *To:* ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
>     *Subject:* Re: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
>
>
>     "Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> wrote on 06/08/2006
>     04:01:48 AM:
>     > Some feedback – sorry for not sending this earlier.
>     > These should be interpreted as mere requests for clarification in
>     > case I missed something…;-)
>     [stuff removed]
>
>     > 3- Now with an in-out exchange with (rel in / non-rel out), the out
>     > message is not mediated by any RMD-client. How would this out
>     > message be delivered to its endpoint, in case the "in" message was
>     > resent by RMS-client? It probably should contain explicit endpoint
>     > info (wsa:To?) but then how does the server know when to add this,
>     > while it would not have to if the in message originated from the
>     > sending endpoint vs. the RMS-client?
>     > Are we saying that the anon URI template should be understood
>     > outside RM components? (doesn't that fall under wsa scope, and
>     > beyond wsrm scope?)
>
>     Not sure I followed this but let me try...
>     In the rel-in/non-rel-out case, if the RMS-client resends the
>     rel-in message then I would suspect that all but one of those
>     attempts would get back a 202 since all but one are dups.
>     In the one non-202 case if the replyTo was anon then it would
>     carry the response.
>     But doesn't this assume that the "duplicate elimination" delivery
>     assurance is in effect between the RMD and the AD? Can we really
>     assume this? Can we assume that the RMS is aware of this?
>
>     [stuff removed]
>

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]