RE: [ws-rx] Mailing list discussion

["Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

> I also expect IBM, BEA, and Microsoft to be trying to resolve each
> others concerns on the security issues.

Yes, we have been having positive discussions both on and off the list
on this in my opinion between those companies and the rest of the TC as
well. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:02 AM
To: wsrx
Subject: [ws-rx] Mailing list discussion

Looking at the schedule
(http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/20060
6/msg00008.html)
* June 22nd Target for all issues closed

I am highly concerned that we will not meet this target without a
greater level of participation - in particular more discussion on the
mailing list. 

In particular I would like to get to the point where we can resolve
issues effectively on the calls which means 
1) having concrete proposals
2) having had those proposals discussed on the mailing list
3) using the calls to reach consensus or vote

If there is no discussion on the list it is only reasonable that the
owners of the issues assume that their proposals are acceptable. 
The onus is on the TC to review the issues before the call and to raise
concerns BEFORE the calls. 

In particular I would expect us to be able to deal quickly and
effectively with these issues:

i133 Duplicate text in fault section
i127 Make Accept/AcksTo consistent
i129 Define "discard"
i130 what does ack interval refer to
i125 Protocol precondition requires knowledge of policies
i126 unclear text regarding wsa:Action

I also expect IBM, BEA, and Microsoft to be trying to resolve each
others concerns on the security issues. 

Paul

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com