ws-rx message

Subject: PR010 - a proposal

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:49:09 -0500

PR010 is correct in that the spec seems to imply that AckReq should
really only be piggy-backed on a message and not sent as a
stand-alone message. The current text says:
The RM Source MAY request an Acknowledgement Message from
the RM Destination at any time by including an
AckRequested header block in any message targeted to the
RM Destination.

I propose we change it to:
The RM Source MAY request an Acknowledgement Message from
the RM Destination at any time by transmitting an AckRequested
header block independently or it MAY including an AckRequested
header block on any message targeted to the RM Destination.

This text aligns it with similar text we use for SeqAck headers.
thanks
-Doug