[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: PR022: updated proposal
The attached update incorporates the Chris and PaulF's feedback. A number of people have said that they would like to see LastMsgNumber in CloseSequence as well. While I'm somewhat sympathetic to this idea, from my point of view it adds a lot of complication to the spec for little benefit. We have to say that LastMsgNumber must appear in either CS or TS and possibly both. If it appears in both CS and TS then the values have to agree (we might need to define a new fault to cover the case where they don't agree). We'd have to say that if you include LastMsgNumber in CS then you didn't necessarily have to send the TS, but that if you didn't include LastMsgNumber in CS (or didn't send a CS) then you *do* have to send a TS with LastMsgNumber, etc. - gp <<wsrm-1.1-spec-pr-i022.pdf>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]