That URI is used in an EPR. You still have to do EPR comparison.
There is no difference between the current spec and our proposal in this
regard.
As I said below, I’m not convinced this one is an issue with the
current spec or our proposal.
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:10 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Issue 27: Where do Sequence Faults go when the RMS
is anonymous
Sounds like
you're advocating full EPR comparing to know this.
This issue
should actually be closed w/no action since the current spec offers a solution
- if the normal WSA Anon URI will not work for people then they can use the
RManonURI. Easy.
thanks
-Doug
__________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6906 | dug@us.ibm.com
|
Marc
Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>
11/14/2006
11:52 AM
|
|
To
|
Marc
Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>, Paul Fremantle
<paul@wso2.com>, "ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org"
<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE:
[ws-rx] Issue 27: Where do Sequence Faults go when the RMS is anonymous
|
|
In our proposal for PR001 if the AcksTo were
set to the same EPR as the MakeConnectionToEPR then there wouldn't be any
issue. That said even in our proposal some advice noting the need to poll for
faults in this circumstance wouldn't hurt, though I'm not convinced it's needed
either.
If PR001 closes with no action I think I still have the same stance that
advice for the need to poll faults in this circumstance wouldn't hurt, but I
still am not convinced even if we're talking about the RM anon URI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:41 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Where do Sequence Faults go when the RMS is
anonymous
Suppose the faultsTo, acksTo and replyTo of a message are all WS-A
anonymous, but with different reference parameters. Which should the RMD
use to respond with a SequenceFault.
The answer seems to be the acksTo EPR. But if this is different from the
replyTo then the RMD cannot return the fault on the backchannel.
Furthermore, if the acksTo is WSRM Anonymous, then it isn't clearly
stated that the faults should be polled for using MC.
Paul
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com