[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: PR Issue 13 SequenceAcknowledgement protocol response for AcksTo =wsa:anonymous
PR Issue 13, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml#i013
, asks if an ack needs to be mapped to the original HTTP Response for the
message. It also suggests that maybe wsaAnonymous is not an allowed value for
acksTo and if so should be explicitly forbidden. I do not believe wsa:Anonymous should be barred from use in
acksTo. I think the spec is pretty clear that the only barred value is
wsa:None. I don’t think we can address the mapping of an ack in
this case to the HTTP layer as the underlying binding is out of our scope. In
this case I think the specification already allows flexibility to send an ack
on the HTTP response for the original request, or on a subsequent request
including using AckRequested. If everyone else agrees I suggest we provide that feedback
and close this issue with no action. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]