[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR Issue 13 SequenceAcknowledgement protocol responsefor AcksTo = wsa:anonymous
Marc In the case of AckRequested over an anon HTTP connection, I believe the RMD should respond directly. After all it doesn't know when the next HTTP connection will come in to respond on. So I think they have a point and we should state this. Paul Marc Goodner wrote: > > PR Issue 13, > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml#i013 , asks if > an ack needs to be mapped to the original HTTP Response for the > message. It also suggests that maybe wsaAnonymous is not an allowed > value for acksTo and if so should be explicitly forbidden. > > I do not believe wsa:Anonymous should be barred from use in acksTo. I > think the spec is pretty clear that the only barred value is wsa:None. > > I don’t think we can address the mapping of an ack in this case to the > HTTP layer as the underlying binding is out of our scope. In this case > I think the specification already allows flexibility to send an ack on > the HTTP response for the original request, or on a subsequent request > including using AckRequested. > > If everyone else agrees I suggest we provide that feedback and close > this issue with no action. > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle paul@wso2.com (646) 290 8050 "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]