[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR Issue 34: gap is not defined
Marc In our discussions about PR22 I got the feeling that there were at least two definitions of gap around. The situation we were discussing was: AS 'send's 100 messages to RMS. RMD receives messages 1-49, 51-80 from the RMS. There is obviously a gap (msg 50). Now RMD receives message 50. Is there a gap? Paul Marc Goodner wrote: > I think the meaning of gap is already clear and does not need to be added to our glossary. > > I think we can close this one with no action. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:26 AM > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ws-rx] ISSUE: gap is not defined > > Reading the spec to discuss Issue 22, I notice that we do not define > what a "gap" is. It seems reasonably pertinent to some of the > discussions we are having, and I think we should more clearly define it. > > Paul > > -- > Paul Fremantle > VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > paul@wso2.com > (646) 290 8050 > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle paul@wso2.com (646) 290 8050 "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]