Removing it sounds like the right thing to do to me.
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:28 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Removal of MC from RM spec
I removed MakeConnection from the RM
spec, this involved:
- deleting sections 3.10(MC), and
3.11(MessagePending)
- deleting section 4.9 - Unsupported
Selection Fault
- deleting the MC/MP specific xml from
the schema and wsdl
- deleting the MC-specific state tables
- deleting appendix C.6 - the MC
example
And the docs in Kavi have been updated.
Open question:
- There is still one reference to MC
(in the /wsrm:CreateSequence/wsrm:Offer/wsrm:Endpoint definition):
Implementations MAY use
the WS-MakeConnection anonymous URI template and
doing so implies that
messages will be retrieved using a mechanism such as
the MakeConnection
message.
I think this is related to issue
27. I don't think it makes a lot of sense to
require all specs that define an
EPR to explicitly have to mention MC or the
MCanonURI unless there's
something unique about their EPR - which is not the
case for RM's EPR (IMO).
To that end, I'd like to propose that we remove
the above text.
thanks
-Doug