OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Mistake in wsp namespace in wsrmp and wsmc


We are writing to you as co-chairs of the W3C WS-Policy WG.

Chris Ferris and I wanted to inform you as early as possible that the WS-Policy WG has decided to republish the Candidate Recommendation drafts of WS-Policy 1.5 Framework and Attachment.  We expect these documents will be re-published later in March or in early April.

The republication is being done to fix some errors that were found in the specifications that effect the WS-Policy UDDI interoperability testing.

Note that the WS-Policy namespace URI is not changing with this republication but the namespace URI is being used to define new URIs which were incorrect in the previous CR drafts.

Paul Cotton and Chris Ferris

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> Sent: March 14, 2007 11:05 AM
> To: Anish Karmarkar; tom@coastin.com
> Cc: wsrx; Mary McRae
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Mistake in wsp namespace in wsrmp and wsmc
>
> This should be fixed before we submit this for a standards approval
> ballot. It should not be saved for a later errata.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 5:03 PM
> To: tom@coastin.com
> Cc: wsrx; Mary McRae
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Mistake in wsp namespace in wsrmp and wsmc
>
> I agree that this can be fixed as an "errata". I'm sure this won't be
> the only typo or bug that we'll have to fix.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Tom Rutt wrote:
> > Tom Rutt wrote:
> >> both the docs wsrmp and wsmc under cs ballot have a mistake in the
> >> namespace for
> >> wsp.
> > However,  the schema does not use the wsp namespace, and it is used
> > only in exemplars of use of the assertion.
> >
> > Since this is an obvious bug, with an obvious fix, and it is not used
> > normatively, I feel it could
> > be handled via an errata.
> >
> > Tom
> >>
> >> ERROR:   http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-ws-policy-20070228
> >> CORRECT: http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy
> >>
> >> Hopefully, if Mary can be present on our call on Thursday, and we can
> >> have 2/3 members prsent, we could
> >> have a real time CS ballot to fix this error.
> >>
> >> My colleague Toshi Nishimura discovered this error recently
> >>
> >
> >


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]