[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: AW: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?
I support that. We are implementing a WSP parser and a first version of a WSP processor that uses the parsed policy to create messages according to the policy. We came across some problems as noted in some of my issues because WSP is fairly complex and IMHO in some cases confusing. What I would also like to see is a better mapping to the WS Security specification. IMHO some of the interop uses cases of WS Security can not described with WSP. Regards, Werer > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Hal Lockhart [mailto:email@example.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2006 16:11 > An: Martin Gudgin; Marc Goodner; Dittmann, Werner; > firstname.lastname@example.org > Betreff: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of > the same type? > > I have been intending to create an issue similar to this one, > so I will > jump on the bandwagon. > > I think much more can be done to describe: > > 1. which assertions can appear where > 2. what combinations make no sense and should either be > prohibited or it > should be stated they have no agreed meaning (example, encryption > property applied to token) > 3. how policies attached to different wsdl elements, which > all apply in > a given situation, interact with each other. > > Hal > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:email@example.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:22 PM > > To: Marc Goodner; Dittmann, Werner; firstname.lastname@example.org > > Subject: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens > of the same > > type? > > > > Comments lines > > > > Cheers > > > > Gudge > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:email@example.com] > > > Sent: 09 February 2006 20:45 > > > To: Dittmann, Werner; firstname.lastname@example.org > > > Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the > > > same type? > > > > > > This is now logged as issue 28. > > > > > > Marc Goodner > > > Technical Diplomat > > > Microsoft Corporation > > > Tel: (425) 703-1903 > > > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:email@example.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:13 AM > > > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > > > Cc: Marc Goodner > > > Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Multiple supporting tokens of the > > > same type? > > > > > > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD > UNTIL > > > THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER. > > > > > > The issues coordinators will notify the list when that > has occurred. > > > > > > Protocol: ws-sp > > > ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r03-diff.pdf > > > > > > Artifact: spec > > > > > > Type: design > > > > > > Title: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type? > > > > > > Description: > > > > > > Can a Policy have more than one supporting token (of the > same type), > > > e.g. multiple SupportingTokens or multiple > EndorsingSupportingTokens? > > > > [MJG] > > Yes. > > > > > > > > Related issues: > > > none > > > > > > Proposed Resolution: > > > > > > IMHO we need an "overall" ws-sp outline to define which assertions > are > > > allowed at a specific level, for example similar to > > > (a)symmetric binding > > > outline but for to top level policy file. > > > > [MJG] > > The intent of Appendix A ( and other text in the spec that talks to > the > > scope of the various assertions ) is to specify which assertions can > > appear on which WSDL constructs. I'm not sure it makes any sense to > > specify such things in terms of location in a policy file... > > > > > > > > Werner Dittmann > > > Siemens COM MN CC BD TO > > > mailto:Werner.Dittmann@siemens.com > > > Tel: +49(0)89 636 50265 > > > Mobil: +49(0)172 85 85 245 > > > >