RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?

["Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>]

> What I would also like to see is a better mapping to
> the WS Security specification. IMHO some of the interop
> uses cases of WS Security can not described with WSP.

Can you please describe the specific interop use cases that are not covered?

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:werner.dittmann@siemens.com]
> Sent: February 16, 2006 3:35 AM
> To: Hal Lockhart; Martin Gudgin; Marc Goodner; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: AW: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the same
> type?
> 
> I support that. We are implementing a WSP parser
> and a first version of a WSP processor that uses the
> parsed policy to create messages according to the
> policy.
> 
> We came across some problems as noted in some of my
> issues because WSP is fairly complex and IMHO in some
> cases confusing.
> 
> What I would also like to see is a better mapping to
> the WS Security specification. IMHO some of the interop
> uses cases of WS Security can not described with WSP.
> 
> Regards,
> Werer
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hlockhar@bea.com]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2006 16:11
> > An: Martin Gudgin; Marc Goodner; Dittmann, Werner;
> > ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Betreff: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of
> > the same type?
> >
> > I have been intending to create an issue similar to this one,
> > so I will
> > jump on the bandwagon.
> >
> > I think much more can be done to describe:
> >
> > 1. which assertions can appear where
> > 2. what combinations make no sense and should either be
> > prohibited or it
> > should be stated they have no agreed meaning (example, encryption
> > property applied to token)
> > 3. how policies attached to different wsdl elements, which
> > all apply in
> > a given situation, interact with each other.
> >
> > Hal
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:22 PM
> > > To: Marc Goodner; Dittmann, Werner; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens
> > of the same
> > > type?
> > >
> > > Comments lines
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Gudge
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> > > > Sent: 09 February 2006 20:45
> > > > To: Dittmann, Werner; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the
> > > > same type?
> > > >
> > > > This is now logged as issue 28.
> > > >
> > > > Marc Goodner
> > > > Technical Diplomat
> > > > Microsoft Corporation
> > > > Tel: (425) 703-1903
> > > > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:werner.dittmann@siemens.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:13 AM
> > > > To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > Cc: Marc Goodner
> > > > Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Multiple supporting tokens of the
> > > > same type?
> > > >
> > > > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD
> > UNTIL
> > > > THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
> > > >
> > > > The issues coordinators will notify the list when that
> > has occurred.
> > > >
> > > > Protocol:  ws-sp
> > > > ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r03-diff.pdf
> > > >
> > > > Artifact:  spec
> > > >
> > > > Type: design
> > > >
> > > > Title: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?
> > > >
> > > > Description:
> > > >
> > > > Can a Policy have more than one supporting token (of the
> > same type),
> > > > e.g. multiple SupportingTokens or multiple
> > EndorsingSupportingTokens?
> > >
> > > [MJG]
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Related issues:
> > > > none
> > > >
> > > > Proposed Resolution:
> > > >
> > > > IMHO we need an "overall" ws-sp outline to define which assertions
> > are
> > > > allowed at a specific level, for example similar to
> > > > (a)symmetric binding
> > > > outline but for to top level policy file.
> > >
> > > [MJG]
> > > The intent of Appendix A ( and other text in the spec that talks to
> > the
> > > scope of the various assertions ) is to specify which assertions can
> > > appear on which WSDL constructs. I'm not sure it makes any sense to
> > > specify such things in terms of location in a policy file...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Werner Dittmann
> > > > Siemens COM MN CC BD TO
> > > > mailto:Werner.Dittmann@siemens.com
> > > > Tel:   +49(0)89 636 50265
> > > > Mobil: +49(0)172 85 85 245
> > > >
> >