[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [ws-sx] RE: Issue PR031: Inconsistencies with RFC 2119
I’m of the opinion that the current language in the specification
with respect to these points is OK. I propose we close this with no action. Subject: Issue PR031: Inconsistencies with RFC 2119
[[ gleaned from the spreadsheet of SP PR comments posted at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx-comment/200704/msg00000.html
]] Protocol: ws-securitypolicy http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-diff.pdf Artifact: spec / schema Type: editorial Title: Inconsistencies with RFC 2119 Description: Inconsistencies with RFC 2119 Related issues: None. Proposed Resolution: section 5.2.2 -- line 740: Change "cannot" to
'MUST NOT" |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]