Subject: Issue i140: WS-SP examples Draft : Incorrect order of<wsu:Timestamp> element for Strict Layout
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
Incorrect order of <Timestamp> element for Strict Layout
Section 2.2.3 (WSS11 Anonymous With Certs) talks about a policy having Layout assertion as:
The position of the <wsu:Timestamp> element is after the signature that signs it.
As per strict layout rules for WSS11, the <wsu:Timestamp> element should have occurred before the
<ds:Signature> element covering it.
The example should be rectified accordingly.