RE: [ws-sx] Issue i142: Examples 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 are miss-labeled

[Greg Carpenter <gregcarp@microsoft.com>]

Issue i142.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hlockhar@bea.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 12:47 PM
> To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: Marc Goodner
> Subject: [ws-sx] New Issue: Examples 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 are miss-labeled
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
>
> Protocol:  ws-sp examples
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/24008/ws
> -sp-usecases-examples-draft-14-02.doc
>
>
> Artifact:  examples
>
> Type:
>
> editorial
>
> Title:
>
> Examples 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 are miss-labeled
>
> Description:
>
> Examples 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 are identified as being based on WSS 1.1.
> However, both require the use of mechanisms (e.g. DerivedKeyToken)
> defined in WS-SecureConversation.
>
> The text refers to EncryptedKey as a WSS 1.1 feature, but EncryptedKey
> is defined by XML Enc and has been present in WSS since version 1.0. I
> am not sure if there is any dependency of these examples on WSS 1.1, but
> surely their use of WS-SecureConversation is a much more significant
> difference between them and the prior examples.
>
> Related issues:
>
> None
>
> Proposed Resolution:
>
> Modify the titles of these examples to make it clear that they are
> examples of the use of WS-SecureConversation, not (just) WSS 1.1.