Tom:
I may have missed something in the on-air
discussion, but the example given in Colleen's proposal[1] had no 'wstx' in the
product part:
To be consistent, I'd imagine WS-AT would
just be 'wsat' and WS-BA would be 'wsba'. I don't feel strongly about
March vs. April, but we should be consistent across the three
specs.
From: Thomas Freund
[mailto:tjfreund@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 12:46 PM
To:
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw:
Editors instructions
Max & Andy
The only thing that passed my mind was whether the
namespace should be:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba/2006/03 (if we were attempting to follow any
sort of convention).
Regards
Tom
"Max Feingold"
<Max.Feingold@microsoft.com>
"Max Feingold"
<Max.Feingold@microsoft.com>
03/02/2006 02:19 PM |
|
Andy:My intention
for WS-C was to update all references in the text, as Tom
indicates.
From: Thomas Freund [mailto:tjfreund@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 10:35
AM
To:
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw:
Editors instructions
Andrew,
I had intended to do a global change (including
the refs --- and several additional lines that seem to have been missed in the
issue)
Tom
Andrew Wilkinson3
<awilkinson@uk.ibm.com>
Andrew Wilkinson3 <awilkinson@uk.ibm.com>
03/02/2006 11:42 AM |
To |
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org |
cc |
|
Subject |
Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors
instructions |
|
Max, Tom
In the interests of consistency how far do you plan
to go with the changes
for WS-Coor and WS-BA for issue 15?
I intend
to update AT to describe coor with a namespace of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03. At the moment I don't
intend to update the non-normative WSCOOR
reference to refer to the new
specification; changing the list of authors
and publication date etc. Does
this seem reasonable - I don't feel
strongly about this, just that it
would be good for all 3 specs to be
updated similarly.
Thanks,
Andy
Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB
02/03/2006
16:14
To
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
[ws-tx-editors]
Fw: Editors instructions
One further
thing.
As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had
cumulative
change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have
no
approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should
be
tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the
OASIS
templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't
been
tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from
now.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and
Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab,
UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on
02/03/2006 16:08 -----
Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM
To
02/03/2006 16:02
wstx-editors
cc
Subject
Editors
instructions
Hello Editors,
Per
the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get updated
drafts to
the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.
Please use the following conventions to
ensure consistency:
On the front page of each spec, please ensure you use
the appropriate "doc
identifier", "location" and "Technical committee" name
and correct form of
statustext.
1. Doc identifier value (this value
should be on the line following
"Document Identifier" and in the page
footer)
wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03
2.
Location value:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
3. Technical committee
OASIS WS-TX TC
(Note upper case
WS-TX)
4. Status.
The first line of the status section should
state:
This document is published by the WS-TX TC as a ?working
draft".
Please use a file name that is the doc identifier with a ".doc"
file
extension e.g wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc
We don't need to generate
new PDFs yet. We will produce PDFs whenever the
TC adopts a new
CD.
The issues that we want to incorporate in these drafts are listed
below by
spec.
WS-Coordination
Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13,
15, 17, (18-21)
WS-AtomicTransaction
Issues: 15,
17
WS-BusinessActivity
Issues: 7, 15,
17,
Regards,
Ian