Re: Fw: [ws-tx] Issue 030 - consolidated refinement of Proposal 2

[Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com>]

Mark Little wrote:
>
> WS-AT, currently:
>
> "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the 
> condition stated in the preamble is met. When used in a transaction 
> protocol, these faults are targeted at a destination endpoint 
> according to the protocol fault handling rules defined for that 
> protocol. "
>
> Since we know that WS-AT is a transaction protocol, this text looks 
> odd. I'd suggest:
>
> "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the 
> condition stated in the preamble is met. These faults are targeted at 
> a destination endpoint according to the fault handling rules defined 
> for that protocol. "
But "that protocol" is this protocol! I think this is a mechanical 
transposition from WS-C. AT needs to say:

"These faults are formulated as terminal notification messages in 
accordance with the rules laid out in Section 9, 'Use of WS-Addressing 
Headers'."

Alastair