Re: Fw: [ws-tx] Issue 030 - consolidated refinement of Proposal 2

[Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>]

I'm happy to either change the "that" to "this" in my original text 
(which was a minimal update on the text Ian sent round), or go with your 
suggestion.

Mark.


Alastair Green wrote:
>
> Mark Little wrote:
>>
>> WS-AT, currently:
>>
>> "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the 
>> condition stated in the preamble is met. When used in a transaction 
>> protocol, these faults are targeted at a destination endpoint 
>> according to the protocol fault handling rules defined for that 
>> protocol. "
>>
>> Since we know that WS-AT is a transaction protocol, this text looks 
>> odd. I'd suggest:
>>
>> "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the 
>> condition stated in the preamble is met. These faults are targeted at 
>> a destination endpoint according to the fault handling rules defined 
>> for that protocol. "
> But "that protocol" is this protocol! I think this is a mechanical 
> transposition from WS-C. AT needs to say:
>
> "These faults are formulated as terminal notification messages in 
> accordance with the rules laid out in Section 9, 'Use of WS-Addressing 
> Headers'."
>
> Alastair
>
>