[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 - Correction in Revision History
Thanks Monica, Yes, we need to mention issue 58 in the revision history. -----Original Message----- From: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 4:40 PM To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Joe Fialli; Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East Subject: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 - Correction in Revision History For WS-Coordination cd-02, there is no mention in the Revision History as to the decision at the F2F regarding Issue 058. This should be reflected. Reference: WS-C cd 02: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/18552/ws tx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-06.zip Meeting minutes (excerpt) 1 June 2006: i058 - WS-C: Definition of Referencing Specification Mark: We use the term as a short-hand. Ram: There are several proposals for this. - Proposals by Ram, Mark, and Alastair were posted to the chatroom. Ian: Mark's text is more verbose than Ram's. What is in it that is not in Ram's? Peter: The inclusion of other applications that use WS-Coordination. How many times is the term "referencing specification" used? Bob: Only once. It is better to re-write and avoid defining a new term. Bob's proposal is adopted. This is to modify the text in the specification to avoid the use of the term "referencing specification." (Original minutes uploaded 12 June found at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/email/archives/200606 /msg00062.html)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]