Re: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 - Correction in Revision History

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Please also add Issue 064 because the lines 618-621 were deleted as 
well. This was verified in today's call. Thanks.

>jeyaraman: Thanks Monica,
>Yes, we need to mention issue 58 in the revision history. 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
>Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 4:40 PM
>To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: Joe Fialli; Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East
>Subject: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 - Correction in Revision History
>
>For WS-Coordination cd-02, there is no mention in the Revision History 
>as to the decision at the F2F regarding Issue 058.  This should be 
>reflected.
>
>Reference:
>WS-C cd 02: 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/18552/ws
>tx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-06.zip
>Meeting minutes (excerpt) 1 June 2006:
>
>    i058 - WS-C:   Definition of Referencing Specification
>    Mark: We use the term as a short-hand.
>    Ram: There are several proposals for this.
>    - Proposals by Ram, Mark, and Alastair were posted to the chatroom.
>    Ian: Mark's text is more verbose than Ram's.  What is in it that is
>    not in Ram's?
>    Peter: The inclusion of other applications that use
>    WS-Coordination.  How many times is the term "referencing
>    specification" used?
>    Bob: Only once.  It is better to re-write and avoid defining a new
>term.
>    Bob's proposal is adopted.  This is to modify the text in the
>    specification to avoid the use of the term "referencing
>specification."
>
>(Original minutes uploaded 12 June found at: 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/email/archives/200606
>/msg00062.html)
>
>
>  
>