Re: [ws-tx] Issue 085 - WS-BA: Protocol messages should be redefinedto provide specific guarantees

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> freund: Ram
> I would agree with the proposed changes with the following clarifications:
>
> Should the fault *Fault *be modified to distinguish between 
> ParticipantCompletion & CoordinatorCompletion (i.e. Completing/Fault 
> only occurs for the latter).
>
> *Exit *
>
>             “Upon receipt of this notification, the coordinator knows
>             that the participant will no longer participate in the
>             business activity, and *<insert> any pending work was
>             discarded by the participant and <end insert>* any work
>             performed by the participant related to the protocol
>             instance was successfully EXITED. For the next protocol
>             message the coordinator should send an Exited
>             notification. This message may be sent by a participant
>             only from the Active or Completing states.”
>
> Regards
> Tom

mm1: To alleviate any potential confusion (as Cancel and Exit are 
different states), would we not also replace 'canceled' with 'exited'? 
(UPPERCASE above)