[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept Completion protocol registrations
The proposed modification to resolution seems fine. -----Original Message----- From: Alastair Green [mailto:alastair.green@choreology.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:24 AM To: Ram Jeyaraman Cc: Ian Robinson; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept Completion protocol registrations Further minor editorial: "A Completion protocol coordinator must be the root coordinator of an atomic transaction. The registration service for a subordinate coordinator MUST respond to an attempt to register for this coordination protocol with the WS-Coordination fault CannotRegisterParticipant." Changing "the" to "a" in the first sentence -- there is no previously mentioned specific coordinator: we are discussing a hypothetical instance, mentioned here for the first time. The guts of the statement is the second sentence, which is where the implementation-constraining MUST should reside, I think. (You could drop the first sentence and the normative force would be preserved.) Alastair Ram Jeyaraman wrote: > Proposed resolution: (a minor editorial correction to Ian's proposal > below) > > "The coordinator that supports the Completion protocol MUST be the > root coordinator of the atomic transaction. The registration service > for a subordinate coordinator must respond to an attempt to register > for this coordination protocol with the WS-Coordination fault > CannotRegisterParticipant." > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:38 AM > To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only root coordinators can > accept Completion protocol registrations > > I agree that we need to document the restriction that only root > coordinators can should accept Completion registrations. > I propose the following small amendment to the suggested resolution, > to be inserted before line 161 of WS-AT: > > "The coordinator the Completion protocol MUST be the root coordinator > of the atomic transaction. The registration service for a subordinate > coordinator must respond to an attempt to register for this > coordination protocol with the WS-Coordination fault CannotRegisterParticipant. > > Regards, > Ian > > > > > > "Ram Jeyaraman" > > <Ram.Jeyaraman@mi > > crosoft.com> > To > <ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org> > > 06/04/2006 18:48 > cc > > > > Subject > [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only > > root coordinators can accept > > Completion protocol > registrations > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is identified as WS-TX issue 050. > > Please ensure follow-ups have a subject line starting "Issue 050 - > WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept Completion protocol > registrations". > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alastair Green [mailto:alastair.green@choreology.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 4:36 PM > To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ws-tx] New Issue: WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept > Completion protocol registrations > > Issue name -- WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept Completion > protocol registrations > > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL > THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER. > > The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred. > > Target document and draft: > > Protocol: WS-AT > > Artifact: spec > > Draft: > > WS-AT CD 0.1 uploaded > > Link to the document referenced: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17325/ > ws > tx-wsat-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf > > Section and PDF line number: > > Section 4.2, "Completion Protocol", l. 146 > > > Issue type: > > Design / Editorial > > > Related issues: > > New Issue: WS-AT: Is Completion protocol mandatory? > > > Issue Description: > > Only root coordinators can accept registrations for Completion protocol. > > Others must fault. > > > Issue Details: > > None. > > > Proposed Resolution: > > Add new para at l. 151 as follows: > > "An initiator MUST NOT target a registration for the Completion > Protocol > > at a Subordinate Coordinator. The Registration Service for a > Subordinate > > Coordinator must respond to an attempt to register for this > coordination > > protocol with the WS-Coordination fault CannotRegisterParticipant." > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]