OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-tx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept Completion protocol registrations


A minor editorial change:

"A Completion protocol coordinator must be the root coordinator of an
atomic transaction. The registration service for a subordinate
coordinator MUST respond to an attempt to register for this coordination
protocol with the WS-Coordination fault Cannot Register Participant."

-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Jeyaraman [mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:23 PM
To: Alastair Green
Cc: Ian Robinson; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only root coordinators can
accept Completion protocol registrations

The proposed modification to resolution seems fine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alastair Green [mailto:alastair.green@choreology.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:24 AM
To: Ram Jeyaraman
Cc: Ian Robinson; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only root coordinators can
accept Completion protocol registrations

Further minor editorial:

"A Completion protocol coordinator must be the root coordinator of an
atomic transaction. The registration service for a subordinate
coordinator MUST respond to an attempt to register for this coordination
protocol with the WS-Coordination fault CannotRegisterParticipant."


Changing "the" to "a" in the first sentence -- there is no previously
mentioned specific coordinator: we are discussing a hypothetical
instance, mentioned here for the first time.

The guts of the statement is the second sentence, which is where the
implementation-constraining MUST should reside, I think. (You could drop
the first sentence and the normative force would be preserved.)

Alastair

Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
> Proposed resolution: (a minor editorial correction to Ian's proposal
> below)
>
> "The coordinator that supports the Completion protocol MUST be the 
> root coordinator of the atomic transaction. The registration service 
> for a subordinate coordinator must respond to an attempt to register 
> for this coordination protocol with the WS-Coordination fault 
> CannotRegisterParticipant."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:38 AM
> To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only root coordinators can 
> accept Completion protocol registrations
>
> I agree that we need to document the restriction that only root 
> coordinators can should accept Completion registrations.
> I propose the following small amendment to the suggested resolution, 
> to be inserted before line 161 of WS-AT:
>
> "The coordinator the Completion protocol MUST be the root coordinator 
> of the atomic transaction. The registration service for a subordinate 
> coordinator must respond to an attempt to register for this 
> coordination protocol with the WS-Coordination fault
CannotRegisterParticipant.
>
> Regards,
> Ian
>
>
>
>  
>
>              "Ram Jeyaraman"
>
>              <Ram.Jeyaraman@mi
>
>              crosoft.com>
> To 
>                                        <ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org>
>
>              06/04/2006 18:48
> cc
>  
>
>  
> Subject 
>                                        [ws-tx] Issue 050 - WS-AT: Only
>
>                                        root coordinators can accept
>
>                                        Completion protocol 
> registrations
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
> This is identified as WS-TX issue 050.
>
> Please ensure follow-ups have a subject line starting "Issue 050 -
> WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept Completion protocol 
> registrations".
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alastair Green [mailto:alastair.green@choreology.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 4:36 PM
> To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-tx] New Issue: WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept 
> Completion protocol registrations
>
> Issue name -- WS-AT: Only root coordinators can accept Completion 
> protocol registrations
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL 
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
>
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
>
> Target document and draft:
>
> Protocol:  WS-AT
>
> Artifact:  spec
>
> Draft:
>
> WS-AT CD 0.1 uploaded
>
> Link to the document referenced:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17325/
> ws
> tx-wsat-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf
>
> Section and PDF line number:
>
> Section 4.2, "Completion Protocol", l. 146
>
>
> Issue type:
>
> Design / Editorial
>
>
> Related issues:
>
> New Issue: WS-AT: Is Completion protocol mandatory?
>
>
> Issue Description:
>
> Only root coordinators can accept registrations for Completion
protocol.
>
> Others must fault.
>
>
> Issue Details:
>
> None.
>
>
> Proposed Resolution:
>
> Add new para at l. 151 as follows:
>
> "An initiator MUST NOT target a registration for the Completion 
> Protocol
>
> at a Subordinate Coordinator. The Registration Service for a 
> Subordinate
>
> Coordinator must respond to an attempt to register for this 
> coordination
>
> protocol with the WS-Coordination fault CannotRegisterParticipant."
>
>
>
>
>
>   


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]