PR specifications

[Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>]

The recent ballot to approve the start
of a public review of our 1.2 specs concluded successfully.  We are
required to submit HTML and PDF as well as editable source (in our case,
Word doc) formats of the specs. We are also now required to nominate which
one of these formats is authoritative with respect to the others. (This
is different from the recent discussion and resolution on precedence or
specification and wsdl/schema). 

So, as a TC, we need to agree whether
to state that the source format (Word) or one of the generated (PDF or
HTML) formats is the authoritative format.
Are there any objections to nominating
the source format as the authoritative format?

Please respond with any comments by
the end of this week so we can proceed to PR.

Regards,
Ian Robinson

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature