Re: [wsbpel-reqts] issues coordination call today 1pm pacific/4pmeastern

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

12.1 was already passed so it should have the original description. I 
already sent Peter the text for 12.2.

Diane Jordan wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry for the late reminder - we'll have our bi-weekly issues call today. Call 
> in info is: 877-988-8393, int'l 203 566-8013, pc 770954.
> Topic is agenda for next meeting.  Here's where I think we stand right now:  
> New issues to be opened:  182, 183
> Issues with new proposals this week:
> ->none so far
> Issues deferred from previous meetings:
> -> issues 125: pending resolution of 103 and 51
> -> 169: pending availability of Satish and Yuzo
> -> 160: Alex had sent a draft proposal for this - I'm checking with him if he 
> wants to go to a vote.  
> -> issue 11.1 - deferred to provide more time for review
> -> issue 81 ??? I see this has had a proposal since Dec but somehow can't recall 
> previous discussions
> -> issue 92: pending updated proposal from Dieter
> Long running issues
> -> issue 103: work in progress
> -> issue 2: work in progress
> -> issue 82: review any questions on additional material to be added  
> -> issues  107: I've asked Peter if he'll be ready to discuss his proposal at 
> the next call
> ->issues  91, 97 99:  pending closure of 107  
> -> issue 126:  deferred pending 107
> -> issue 9: deferred pending inclusion of 84 in spec
> -> issue 125: pending 103 and 51
> 
> Peter,  
> I think there's some housekeeping to do on the list.  
> The status of 12 is messed up.  We had a proposal from Yaron.  During the f2f, 
> he changed it to be a proposal for a new issue "12.1" which was voted on and 
> closed.   Yaron split out issue 12.2 as well and opened a new issue on rethrows 
> (183).  
> 12 is showing up on the list as having a proposal to vote and 12.2 is showing up 
> as a new issue to be accepted - I don't think we'd intended subissues to go 
> through the "bug" vote since they're parts of issues already open.  Would you 
> please just move 12.2 to open, open and close 12.1 with the original issue 12 
> proposal and take 12 off the list of issues with proposals to vote?  The minutes 
> from the f2f are now available on the web site, which may help.  
> Yaron - we may need a short description for 12.1.
> 
> Also,  issue 11 is showing up on the list as having a proposal - I think it 
> because 11.1 has a proposal and so don't think it should be there - am I right? 
>  Thanks.  
> 
> Regards, Diane
> IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards
> drj@us.ibm.com
> (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709