OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-spec-edit message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Meeting to get started on editorial process

I had actually left 32 open but if you want to take it that's fine with
me ;-)  The names were meant to apply just to the number before them.

Prasad, do you want to let Paco take 46 (if approved)?

That leaves 23 and 44.  Any takers?


-----Original Message-----
From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Prasad Yendluri
Cc: John Evdemon; Furniss, Peter; Satish Thatte; bpel spec
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Meeting to get started on editorial


I am happy to take the ones you suggest (32, 39, 7 if approved). I Can
take 46 if it gets approved  - since I proposed the resolution and it is
related to 39. )



                      Prasad Yendluri

                      <pyendluri@webmet        To:       Satish Thatte
<satisht@microsoft.com>, bpel spec                         

                                               cc:       Francisco
Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, John Evdemon                         
                      10/06/2003 02:26
<jevdemon@microsoft.com>, "Furniss, Peter"
                      PM                       Subject:  Re:
[wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Meeting to get started on editorial process   

I can take  27, 36, 46

Regards, Prasad

------- Original Message --------

 Subj [wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Meeting to get started on editorial process




 Date Sun, 5 Oct 2003 20:09:15 -0700



 From Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>



  To: bpel spec <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>


  CC: Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM <curbera@us.ibm.com>, John Evdemon

      <jevdemon@microsoft.com>, Furniss, Peter



The closed issues we have are listed below some with my suggestions for
editorial owners
32, 39 (Paco), 41 (Satish), 44, 45 (Satish)
Issue 20 was closed with no action required.

The issues with proposed resolutions are listed below.  Optimistically
assuming they actually get resolved as proposed, I have also suggested a
couple of assignments
7 (Paco), 23, 27, 36, 46, 47 (Kevin).

Everyone is of course welcome to comment and/or volunteer to take on any
or all of these issues.


-----Original Appointment-----
From: Satish Thatte
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:59 AM
To: bpel spec; Satish Thatte
Cc: Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM; John Evdemon; Furniss, Peter
Subject: Meeting to get started on editorial process
When: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific
Time (US & Canada); Tijuana.
Where: conf call

Rescheduled by popular demand ;-)

Dear Editors,

It is time for us to get started with updating the spec.  We have a
number of closed issues and a number of further resolutions likely to
start streaming in.  I propose a phone meeting to assign closed issues
to individual editors.  Since we don't have access to CVS yet we will
also need to define an interim editing process that will let us move
forward without creating chaos in the working drafts.

If this time does not work please propose a few alternative slots.

Call info:

Toll-Free (US & Canada): 866-500-6738
Toll: 203-480-8000
Passcode: 809545


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]