[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: Some suggested minor changes to the spec
I think my comments below were the only purely editorial ones I made. -----Original Message----- From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:43 AM To: BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail) Subject: Some suggested minor changes to the spec 13.5.1 Message Events - It would be good if the first paragraph clarified the fact that the reason why we require the use of messageType (even though it is clearly redundant) is for purposes of readability otherwise readers will get confused as to why its required. The paragraph Paco added in 14.3 about using the part name as the root of the XPATH 1.0 expression screams out for an inline example. I realize we give examples later but it would really help the reader to have the example in front of them when they read that paragraph. Just my two Euros, Yaron
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]